Abstract for: Peer Review Dialog Meeting
Since 2005, there has been an opportunity for joint reflection about the quality of the peer review process at each conference. Last year, for the first time we talked amongst reviewers, thread-chairs, the program committee and the society’s head office and policy council. Some points are worth being reminded for this year’s discussion: shall thread-chairs give feedback to their reviewers? shall there by types of papers? shall there be a reviewer-workshop? Beyond this, one might ask if the conference proceedings should be a publication on their own (ISI): surely there are pros and cons. Every other question relevant to members may be raised during this session.